Original article can be found at 听
Originally published on February 22, 2016 By Paul Larmer听
Perhaps the only coherent message to come out of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge debacle in eastern Oregon has been this: Local people, rather than the federal government, should control the land around their own communities. Just 鈥済ive back鈥� the refuge and other public land in Harney County to those who believe they should rightfully control it and the place will thrive again, says sagebrush ringleader Ammon Bundy, who, incidentally, is not a local himself.听
If this sounds familiar, it may be because you鈥檝e heard it before from the West鈥檚 mining, timber and energy industries. Wrapped in the cloak of 鈥渓ocal control,鈥� they argue that, since the locals want the jobs and tax revenue their projects provide, environmentalists and government regulators should just get out of the way. In response, environmentalists, noting the money industry pours into local elections and groups that advocate for unfettered access to public lands, blast the local-control movement as a puppet of industry.听
Which is why it is so interesting to watch this political dynamic turned on its head on Colorado鈥檚 Front Range. There, the energy development along the suburban fringe is facing a local-control movement of a different kind. In the name of democracy and environmental protection, fractivists in several communities have passed ordinances empowering local governments to ban or restrict drilling in their jurisdictions. Predictably, the industry has furiously demanded state and federal regulation, rather than local. And just as predictably, national environmental groups have embraced local control like a long-lost relative.听
Perhaps no one is in a better position to observe the ironies in the struggle between communities and the oil and gas industry than historian Patty Limerick, head of the Center of the American West and author of this issue鈥檚 cover essay. Between 2013 and 2014, she attempted to hold civil discourse between various stakeholders in a series of events called FrackingSENSE. She discovered, to her delight, that it is possible 鈥� if you can get the people involved to honestly consider each other鈥檚 viewpoints and the complex history that binds us together.听
We鈥檙e all hypocrites at some level, Limerick notes, from the CEOs who blithely ignore the messes their industry creates, to the car-driving suburbanites who wink at the fact that their comfortable lives literally float on a sea of hydrocarbons. So how do we find common ground? Limerick has a uniquely practical suggestion: Let鈥檚 sit down and eat. Will that solve everything? No, but as she writes, getting together over good food always delivers one 鈥渂edrock benefit鈥�: Everyone has to stop talking long enough to chew 鈥� and thereby listen. That might not seem like much, but we have to start somewhere. Maybe over barbecue, both Sagebrush Rebels and fractivists can stop arguing long enough to re-discover their shared interests in controlling their own destinies and nourishing their passion for the West.听